US STATE DEPT SPOX ON TURKEY'S TWITTER BAN

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

DAILY PRESS BRIEFING

DPB # 51

MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2014

TURKEY'S TWITTER BAN

QUESTION:  -- the Turkish Government tweet the rules of engagement or perhaps put them on Facebook or YouTube or something like that.

MS. HARF:  I would note here that there have been more tweets from Turkey since the government blocked it than there were before.

QUESTION:  So can we just --

MS. HARF:  Which is an interesting, I think, signal to people that try to clamp down on freedom of expression that it doesn’t work and isn’t the right thing to do.

QUESTION:  Are you helping in this? 

QUESTION:  So --

MS. HARF:  Hold on.  We’ll – let me finish Matt. 

QUESTION:  So do you have any additional comment on the Twitter ban?  When Erdogan announced that he was going to do this, he said now every – he didn’t care about international reaction and now the world would see the power of the Turkish Republic. 

MS. HARF:  Well, I think what the world saw was the number of people inside Turkey tweeting about what they thought about it being blocked there. 

QUESTION:  Well, could I ask you what you think --

MS. HARF:  Yes.

QUESTION:  -- about the power of the Turkish Republic since they have failed so dramatically to enforce this ban? 

MS. HARF:  We have conveyed our serious concerns over this action directly to Turkish authorities, both from here and on the ground.  Obviously, we support freedom of expression in Turkey and everywhere else.  We oppose any action to encroach on the right to free speech, and continue to urge directly the Turkish Government to unblock its citizens’ access to Twitter and ensure free access to all social media platforms --  

QUESTION:  Right, but -- 

MS. HARF:  -- so they can see what you and everyone else tweets.

QUESTION:  Right, but what does it say to you, if anything, about the power of the Turkish Republic? 

MS. HARF:  In what respect? 

QUESTION:  The fact that they’ve tried to ban it and it hasn’t worked.  I mean, is this the kind of thing that you want to see a NATO ally doing or boasting about --

MS. HARF:  No.

QUESTION:  -- beforehand, and then --

MS. HARF:  No.

QUESTION:  -- failing miserably at it? 

MS. HARF:  Well, the second part – clearly, we think it’s good that people inside Turkey are still able to express themselves, but that doesn’t mean that it should be blocked.  I wasn’t trying to give that statistic -- 

QUESTION:  Okay. 

MS. HARF:  -- in terms of saying that it’s an acceptable action. 

QUESTION:  So you’re --

TWITTER BAN HAS NO PLACE IN DEMOCRACY

MS. HARF:  No, clearly this is not an action we think the Turkish Government should take.  We’ve told them that directly.  We will continue to tell them that directly.  There’s no place in a democracy for this kind of clamping down on people’s right to free speech.  There’s just not.

QUESTION:  Okay.  And so you would encourage people in Turkey to defy – to continue to defy the prime minister’s ban.  Is that --

MS. HARF:  I’m not going to go that far, but I – what I will say is it’s important for people all over the world to hear what the Turkish people have to say.

QUESTION:  Do you see any connection between the Twitter issue and the downing of the plane, the Syrian plane, perhaps that Mr. Erdogan is trying to export his --

MS. HARF:  Not at all.

QUESTION:  -- local issues?  You don’t see that? 

MS. HARF:  Not at all.  No, not at all.

QUESTION:  Are you helping the Turks in breaking the blockade? 

MS. HARF:  Is the United States Government? 

QUESTION:  Yeah. 

MS. HARF:  No, not to my knowledge.  We’ve been in contact with Twitter and with the Government of Turkey about this, but to my knowledge, no, we are not.  But we’ve said very clearly to the Turkish Government that this is not acceptable and that we do not think they should be able to block their citizens’ access to these kind of social media platforms. 

QUESTION:  Mm-hmm.  And -- 

QUESTION:  Just to clarify, Marie, you – I asked this question last week, that whether United States Government is involved with this case in the --

MS. HARF:  With Twitter?

QUESTION:  In this dispute between the Twitter and the Turkish Government in terms of the legal process, and you said no.  Still the case?  Still -- 

MS. HARF:  Well, I don’t think I said no; I think Jen said no.  But we saw over the weekend, I think, some more actions being taken, right?  So I’m not sure exactly how you asked the question last week, but what I can say is that we have been in contact with Twitter and separately with the Government of Turkey to talk about the fact that people should not have their access blocked to Twitter.

QUESTION:  So it is a legal dispute right now, and that maybe – I mean, Turkish Government is pursuing this ban, and they took several additional measures during the weekend to stop the people to use Twitter, like DNS ban, et cetera. 

MS. HARF:  Which we think is an encroachment on their citizens’ freedom of expression, and we don’t think that it should be continued. 

QUESTION:  You are in contact with the Twitter in terms of legal dispute or --

MS. HARF:  I’m not say in terms of any – I don’t know the legal – the specific legal aspect you’re referring to.  We are in touch with Twitter, yes, broadly speaking.  I don’t know exactly what that contact is like, but I don’t know if the legal – if that’s an internal Turkish matter, I’m not exactly sure, but we’ve been in contact with both Twitter and the Turkish Government. 

QUESTION:  I mean, because Twitter is represented by the lawyers right now in Turkey, and there will be maybe case against --

MS. HARF:  I don’t have more details on any legal action that may or may not be happening in Turkey.  I just don’t have those details.  What we’ve said is separate and apart from that.  People should be able to express themselves freely, whether it’s on Facebook or Twitter or whatever – Flickr, Tumblr, whatever people want to use – and that governments should not encroach on their – they shouldn’t block access for their citizens to do so.  I don’t have a lot more information.

QUESTION:  Yeah, but --  

QUESTION:  What about Instagram?

MS. HARF:  And Instagram too. 

QUESTION:  Yeah, the problem -- 

QUESTION:  Not Instagram. 

QUESTION:  Not – (laughter).  Don’t play favorites now, Marie. 

MS. HARF:  I am not.  I am not on Instagram, but --  

QUESTION:  The problem, the Turkish Government is trying to get some information about some users, specific users who are tweeting against the government and --

MS. HARF:  What I’m saying is that we oppose the Turkish -- 

QUESTION:  And the Twitter – and my question – okay.  My question is --

MS. HARF:  Yes.

QUESTION:  -- Twitter assured to Turkish Twitter accounts users that they will not disclose any private information.

MS. HARF:  That would be a question for Twitter, not for me.

QUESTION:  Yeah.  But are you supporting this stand of Twitter against Turkish Government?

MS. HARF:  That’s not something that I should take a stand on.  I don’t think that’s something that the company, Twitter, can decide on its own.

QUESTION:  Because --

MS. HARF:  What we have said is that governments should not block access for their citizens.

QUESTION:  Yes.  But at the same time it’s a privacy question – not only freedom of expression, but the people are also trying to protect their privacy --

MS. HARF:  Again, that a question that’s --

QUESTION:  -- and the Turkish Government is trying to get the information of all of the users.

MS. HARF:  That’s a question, I think, is better addressed to Twitter, who controls that issue.  What I am saying is people’s freedom of expression should not be blocked by their own government.

QUESTION:  So no comment about the privacy?

MS. HARF:  I don’t have more for you than this – for you on this case than that. 

QUESTION:  Okay.

MS. HARF:  I’m happy to check with our folks and see if there’s more. 

QUESTION:  Right. 

MS. HARF:  I just don’t think I’ll have more.

QUESTION:  Okay.  Thank you.  Please.

And another question about the jet incident.

MS. HARF:  Yeah.


SYRIAN JET SHOT DOWN BY TURKISH JETS

QUESTION:  Are you concerned that this confrontation between Turkey and Syria can turn into a more broader confrontation just before the elections, because ---

MS. HARF:  Well, I think that’s the question Said just asked, and what I said was it’s a little too early to make sweeping characterizations about what may come from this.  Obviously, we know there was a situation here where the Turks repeatedly warned the Syrians before taking action.  I don’t think I want to probably draw broader conclusions about what will happen going forward.

QUESTION:  No, I’m – my question wasn’t related NATO that Said asked in terms of the NATO involvement.  Beyond the NATO involvement, are you encouraging the parties to deescalate the tension?

MS. HARF:  I mean, we’re certainly in contact with the Turkish Government here on this issue.  I’m not – I mean, in terms of the parties, you’re talking about the Assad regime?

QUESTION:  No, the parties – NATO ally, Turkey.  Because there will be an election this week --

MS. HARF:  Right.

QUESTION:  -- and the main --

MS. HARF:  I’m not seeing the connection here.

QUESTION:  The main opposition party urged to not do any military intervention, military – I mean, unilateral military action against Syria just before the election, to use a populist tool just before the election.  So this is the concern of the main opposition party and other parties in Turkey.

MS. HARF:  I think I probably don’t have much comment on internal Turkish politics or how they may or may not respond --

QUESTION:  It stirs an international crisis.

QUESTION:  Well, are you encouraging the Turks to kind of remain calm and not escalate the situation?

QUESTION:  Yes.

MS. HARF:  I’m not sure how they – I mean I’m not sure there’s even talk of escalation here.  I’m happy to check with our folks and see.  To my understanding, it was a limited situation.  I haven’t heard that there is escalation here. 

QUESTION:  Is --

MS. HARF:  I’m happy to check with our team.  We’re still talking to the Turks to get the facts about what happened here, but I, quite frankly, haven’t heard talk that people are worried about that.

QUESTION:  So – because my question is related to another religious site within Syria belonging to Turkey.  This is a Turkish territory, 35 kilometers from Turkish broader within Syria, and it’s under threat some groups, ISIS and other radical al-Qaida-affiliated groups.  And some cabinet members, Turkish cabinet members, even urged not to do anything to provoke Turkey for any unilateral military action, for example.  This is another concern for Turkey to be part of the unilateral military action within Syria.  So only – not only the jet, but this is another risk for Turkey to involve with Syria in terms of this kind of military action.

MS. HARF:  Well, I don’t have any, in terms of that specific question, any details for you on that.  Again, I think I’ll let the Turkish Government speak for what their response will or won’t be here.  As I said, we’ve talked to them, we’ve gotten the facts of what’s happened here, and if there’s more to share tomorrow, I’m happy to.

QUESTION:  Marie, a question that is on Syria. 

MS. HARF:  Mm-hmm.

QUESTION:  There are report that 600,000 Syrians have applied for asylum in Europe and the United States.  Could you tell us the portion of that that is being sought with the United States?

MS. HARF:  I don’t know the answer, Said.  Let me check with our folks and see.  I don’t have the numbers.

QUESTION:  Just one more question on the Syrian jet. 

MS. HARF:  Uh-huh. 

QUESTION:  You said we’ve established the facts and multiple warning were issued, I guess.

MS. HARF:  Mm-hmm.  By the Turkish Government.

QUESTION:  How – yeah.  How did you establish that?  Did they share any information with the State Department?

MS. HARF:  The Turkish Government?

QUESTION:  Yeah.

MS. HARF:  With the United States Government they did.  I don’t know if it was us or with the Defense Department, but --

QUESTION:  Yeah.  But they shared, like, intelligence information about the incident?

MS. HARF:  I don’t know if it’s intelligence they told us.  They warned the Syrians multiple times.  I don’t know the details of exactly what that --

QUESTION:  Yeah.   But how did you verify what they actually conveyed to you?

MS. HARF:  I can check with our folks and see.

QUESTION:  Were you in touch with them in real time during the incident?

MS. HARF:  I don’t know.  I’m happy to check.  It might be – and it might be the Department of Defense, but I’m happy to check with them.

QUESTION:  So did you --

MS. HARF:  I just don’t know.

QUESTION:  Did you say that these pieces of information were verified, or you’re not sure?

MS. HARF:  We have no reason to believe that it’s not accurate, correct.  Yes. 

QUESTION:  Okay.  But --

MS. HARF:  And I’m happy to see if there are more details about how we verified it, correct.

---

SYRIAN JET DOWNING

QUESTION:  Do you have a comment on the downing of a Syrian jet apparently --

MS. HARF:  Yes.

QUESTION:  -- in the Syrian airspace yesterday by the Turkish?

MS. HARF:  Well, obviously, we’ve been following the issue closely.  We have been in close contact with our Turkish counterparts – I would remind you, NATO allies – regarding the incident.  We are committed to Turkey’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.  We note that the Turkish Government has been fully transparent about the rules of engagement it is operating under since the Syrian Government shot down a Turkish aircraft in 2012.  The Turkish Government in this case said its forces only fired after the Syrian military aircraft violated Turkish airspace and after repeated warnings from Turkish authorities.  Obviously, the Government of Turkey is looking into the incident more, but we are talking to them and will remain in contact with them.

QUESTION:  So to the best of your information, do you have any independent information that it was actually shot down over Syrian airspace or Turkish airspace?

MS. HARF:  Where it was actually shot down, I don’t have specific information about that, but as I said, the Turkish Government said it only fired on the aircraft after it violated Turkish aircraft – or, excuse me, airspace, and was repeatedly warned by the Turkish Government not to do so.

QUESTION:  Are you concerned that any escalation might involve all other NATO allies, considering that you have some sort of a pact with Turkey?

MS. HARF:  Well, I think it’s a little soon to sort of take this more broadly.  I would note that I don’t think Turkey has asked for anything yet in terms of NATO.  Obviously, we’re talking to them about how to move forward here, but again, I think it’s too soon to sort of draw broader characterizations about what might happen next.

QUESTION:  And finally, Brahimi said that he doesn’t see Geneva II reconvening anytime soon.  Do you have any comment on that?

MS. HARF:  Well, we have obviously been working with the special representative quite closely.  We want – all want Geneva – the Geneva process, I would say, to reconvene when we can make progress.  And up until this point, we’ve seen the Syrian regime not come to the table as a party that wants to make progress here.  So I know he’s working on it to see if and when we can reconvene this and how, to see if we can move this diplomatic process forward.

QUESTION:  So you said that Turkey has been fully transparent about the rules of engagement?  What does that mean, exactly?

MS. HARF:  That it has operated under since the Syrian Government shot down a Turkish aircraft in 2012. 

QUESTION:  Right, but --

MS. HARF:  So I think what it means, without knowing all the specifics here, is that, for example, it repeatedly warned --

QUESTION:  Yeah.

MS. HARF:  -- the Syrian aircraft not to violate its airspace.  It only then took action.  That’s what I think rules of engagement refers to here.

QUESTION:  Right.  Right.  But the rules of engagement, are they public?  You don’t have --

MS. HARF:  I can check.

QUESTION:  Is that what that means in terms of --

MS. HARF:  Or do we mean transparent with the United States?  I don’t know.

QUESTION:  Well, transparent – I mean, maybe you’d like to see --

MS. HARF:  I’ll check.

Beyaz Saray'dan Sert Twitter Açıklaması

Beyaz Saray Basın Sekreterliği, Türkiye’de Twitter’in kapatılması ile ilgili olarak, resmi bir açıklama yaptı.

Sekreterlik açıklamada şunları söyledi:

Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Türk hükümetinin vatandaşlarının temel iletişim araçlarını engellemesinden dolayı derinden endişelenmektedir. Biz, Türk halkının bilgiye ulaşımını sınırlandıran, halkın ifade ve toplanma özgürlüğünü kullanmasını azaltıcı ve demokratik yönetim için kritik olan ve ABD’nin bütün dünyada desteklediği açık yönetişim prensipleri ile evrensel değerlere zıt olan bu eyleme karşıyız. Biz ciddi endişelerimizi Türk hükümetine ilettik. Türk yetkilierin bağımsız ve sınırlamadan arınmış her türlü medyanın çalışmasına izin vererek,  basın özgürlüğüne saygı göstermesini talep ediyoruz ve Türk halkının, engellenmiş bütün teknolojilere tam bir ulaşımın sağlanması taleplerini destekliyoruz.

Statement by the Press Secretary on Blocking of Twitter in Turkey

Statement by the Press Secretary on Blocking of Twitter in Turkey

The United States is deeply concerned that the Turkish government has blocked its citizens’ access to basic communication tools.  We oppose this restriction on the Turkish people’s access to information, which undermines their ability to exercise freedoms of expression and association and runs contrary to the principles of open governance that are critical to democratic governance and the universal rights that the United States stands for around the world.  We have conveyed our serious concern to the Turkish government, urge Turkish authorities to respect the freedom of the press by permitting the independent and unfettered operation of media of all kinds, and support the people of Turkey in their calls to restore full access to the blocked technologies.

US State Department on Turkey's twitter ban

This is from State Department Spokesperson regarding the Twitter ban in Turkey:

·       As we have previously stated, we remain very concerned by any suggestion that social media sites could be shut down. Democracies are strengthened by the diversity of public voices. 

• An independent and unfettered media is an essential element of democratic, open societies, and crucial to ensuring official transparency and accountability.

ABD Dışişleri Bakanlığı'nın Twitter Yasağı Açıklaması

Bir ABD Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsü, Türkiye'deki Twitter yasağına ilişkin gönderdiğimiz soruya karşılık olarak çok kısa bir zamanda bir açıklama gönderdi. 

Dışişleri Bakanlığı sözcüsü şunları söyledi: Daha önce de söylediğimiz gibi, Sosyal Medya sitelerinin kapatılması hakkındaki öneriler hakkında oldukça endişeliyiz. Demokrasiler, kamudan gelen farklı sesler (görüşlerle) güçlenir.

Bağımsız ve kısıtlı olmayan medya demokratik, açık toplumların temel unsurudur ve aynı zamanda resmi olarak şeffaflığın ve hesaba çekilirliği garantiye alır.

BEYAZ SARAY'DAN ERDOĞAN'A GÜLEN YALANLAMASI

BEYAZ SARAY'DAN ERDOĞAN'A GÜLEN YALANLAMASI

Başbakan Erdoğan dün bir televizyon kanalında  ABD Başkanı Obama ile telefon görüşmesinde Fethullah Gülen konusunu da açtığını söylemişti. Erdoğan, Obama ile aralarında Gülen hakkında şöyle bir konuşma geçtiğini ifade etmişti: ''Ülkemdeki huzursuzluğun kaynağı oradadır ve sizden gerekeni bekliyorum dedim. Amerika'nın iç güvenliğini tehdit edenleri nasıl benden istiyorsanız bende sizden bu konuda yardım istiyorum dedim ve o da olumlu baktı. Mesaj alındı dedi.''

Beyaz Saray'dan üst düzey bir yetkili, Obama'nın konu ile ilgili olarak böyle bir beyanda bulunmadığını belirtti. Beyaz Saray'dan email yoluyla, Erdoğan'ın bu beyanını sormamız sonrasında gönderilen açıklamada ''Fethullah Gülen ile ilgili olarak Başkan Obama'ya atfedilen cevap gerçek değildir,'' dendi. 

Beyaz Saray'dan gelen açıklamanın devamında ise şunlar belirtiliyor: ''Şubat'ın 19'unda gerçekleşen telefon konuşmasında, Başkan Obama, hukukun üstünlüğü içesinde güvenilir politikalar izlenmesinin ve ülkelerimiz arasında karşılıklık saygı çerçevesindeki ilişkilerin önemini not etti. Türkiye ile, özellikle karşılıklı çıkarlara dayanan birçok bölgesel konularda, beraber çalışmaya olan taahhüdümüz devam etmektedir.''  

White House Refutes PM Erdogan's Remarks!

White House official sent this exclusive statement regarding PM's Erdogan's remarks on Gulen: 
"The response attributed to President Obama with regard to Mr. Gulen is not accurate. In that February 19 call, the President noted the importance of sound policies rooted in the rule of law, as well as the importance of mutually respectful relations between our countries.  Our commitment to working together with Turkey, particularly on a variety of regional issues of mutual interest, continues."

Here is what PM Erdogan said yesterday at a Turkish TV, during a live interview: 
"I talked to Mr. Obama over this issue (religious leader Fethullah Gulen, who lives in Pennsylvania). I told him that the source of my country's  discomfort (unrest) lives there (in US) and I am expecting from you to do whatever is necessary. I ask your help, just like you ask my help whenever some people (live in Turkey) threaten the US' homeland security. And he (Obama) sounded positive, said "the message is taken.

White House comments on the call between Pres Obama and PM Erdogan

White House National Security Council Assistant Press Secretary Laura Lucas commented on Pres Obama and PM Erdogan's phone call which was taken place on Wednesday. Last time the two leaders spoke was 6.5 months ago. Its full readout was published on Wednesday in this blog:

Q: What did you think of the letter sent to Pres Obama on Thursday morning, which is signed by 84 foreign policy experts, former officials, Congressional members & ambassadors etc.?

Lucas: 
''As you know, we don’t comment on presidential correspondence.  More broadly, however, in his call with PM Erdogan on Wednesday, the President raised issues related to the rule of law, as well as the importance of mutually respectful relations between our countries. As you know, the U.S. government repeatedly has been clear about the importance of Turkey upholding principles of due process, freedoms of speech and assembly, and a free media.''  

Commented: Readout of President Obama’s Call with Prime Minister Erdogan

Readout of President Obama’s Call with Prime Minister Erdogan

President Obama spoke by phone today with Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey on a range of bilateral and regional issues. The President affirmed the value he places on a strong, mutually respectful bilateral relationship with the Republic of Turkey and expressed his view that Turkey can demonstrate leadership in the world through positive engagement.  (Obama asks Erdogan to be positive & constructive while engaging w/the world, instead of scolding so that he can claim a leadership. It's now open-secret that Erdogan's engagement w/the rest of the world, during Egypt coup, Gezi Protests, finally the corruption/graft case cannot be qualified as constructive.)

The President and Prime Minister agreed on the importance of close cooperation between our two countries to address the growing terrorist presence in Syria and on the shared interest in continuing efforts to advance a political solution to the Syria conflict. (Obama's first direct emphasize on "terrorist presence in Syria" while speaking to Erdogan. Apparently Obama thinks Erdogan can do better to address this problem. And referring the political solution. Straight American arguments on Syria.)

The President and Prime Minister discussed the importance of encouraging Baghdad and Erbil to find common ground on energy issues and supporting the agreement they achieve.  (Obama reiterates the same US position that PM Erdogan should seek consent of Baghdad over the energy issues while dealing with Erbil.)

The President thanked the Prime Minister for his constructive role in the effort on Cyprus to renew negotiations for a settlement.  (One and only thanks to Erdogan from Obama in the readout) The Prime Minister noted the launch ceremony for the Boeing 737 Peace Eagle on Friday. 

The President and Prime Minister spoke about the importance of quickly concluding the normalization agreement with Israel. (Obama is clearly not satisfied by how the 'normalization process is going. Also recent consensus between Israel-Turkey on a text to normalize relations now again on hold. Before the local elections at the end of the March, observers think Erdogan is not thinking to move forward to normalize the relations. Another request or homework for Erdogan/) 

The leaders also discussed the need for strong, sustainable, and balanced growth in the global economy, and the President noted the importance of sound policies rooted in the rule of law to reassure the financial markets, nurture a predictable investment environment, strengthen bilateral ties, and benefit the future of Turkey. (The final sentence of the readout seems to me the most important one. This sentence implies that the recent bills/legislations ought to be in line w/rule of law.. Clearly referring to recent policies after the graft/corruption case, purging judiciary members and security forces in addition to Internet (censorship) bill, Judicial (HSYK) bill, now the new Intelligence bill. Obama reminds Erdogan about the rule of law, o/wise Erdogan's risking country's investment climate, financial markets.. also Obama warns that the sound policies rooted in the rule of law necessary to ... strengthen bilateral ties w/the US.) 

Though, at the end, talking to the US Pres is a plus for the AKP gov. and they will use the call domestic purposes as well. 

Qs & As on Turkey Internet & Judicial Bill, Iran-Syria

Via-Phone Daily Press Briefing Index

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

1:11 p.m. EST

Briefer: Marie Harf, Deputy Spokesperson

MS. HARF:  Yeah.  Looks like the next question is from Ilhan Tanir, if you could open his line, please.

QUESTION:  Hi Marie, do you hear me?

MS. HARF:  I can hear you, Ilhan, yes.

QUESTION:  Thank you for taking the call.  A quick two questions on Turkey and one question on Syria-Iran.  Question on Turkey:  There are two bills just passed at the parliament and the first one is internet bill.

MS. HARF:  Uh-huh.

QUESTION:  It just actually approved by the President Gul yesterday, and it’s criticized by outside and inside, by many corners.  What’s your reaction to this bill?

MS. HARF:  Yep.  So this is – what we said when the legislation was first approved by the parliament, we share the serious concerns raised by the OSCE and others that the law has the potential to severely restrict free expression, freedom of the press, and access to information over the internet.  We also believe that the law could negatively impact Turkey’s business and investment climate.

We understand that the legislation improved by – approved, excuse me, by President Gul will be subject to further modification by parliament.  During this process, as well as the implementation of any final legislation, I’d say we’re looking to Turkey to uphold – again, I’ve talked about it a few times today – but fundamental freedoms of expression and a free and independent media.

QUESTION:  So as you mentioned, there are two modifications by President Gul.  Will be okay if those two modifications are amended or done at the parliament?

MS. HARF:  I wasn’t saying that.  Obviously, we are looking to Turkey during this process to uphold the fundamental freedoms that really underscore why we’re concerned about this legislation.  I’m not going to get into more detailed analysis about the law or possible modifications.  We’ll take a look at what happens when it happens and make assessments at that time.

QUESTION:  Thank you.  And the second bill, this one passed at the parliament – I asked this question about three weeks ago – and it is awaiting President Gul’s signature again.  It is the bill on the judicial council that will hand control of the judiciary to the executive branch, being again criticized by the EU many, many times, and also there is a big reaction within Turkey.  Do you have any reaction to this one?

MS. HARF:  I haven’t seen the specifics on that one, Ilhan.  I know you’ve asked about this a few times, so let me check with our folks and see if we have more of a response.  I know we don’t always comment on sort of internal Turkish matters, but let me check and see what I can do.

QUESTION:  Actually, that’s exactly what I am asking for, because if you are taking this bill as an internal matter, that means that you’re not taking it as the universal value of democracy as judicial control that will have control to the entire judiciary to the executive branch.  So even if you can get back to me on this, whether you’re taking this as internal matter or as something that will deal blow to the separation of powers would be immensely helpful for the writing record in history.

MS. HARF:  Yep.  Let me see what I can do for you, Ilhan. 

QUESTION:  Thank you.  And my final question is – this question was asked again several times in the past.  This is about the U.S. Treasury’s statement issued on February 7th or 6th about operatives in Iran that is – they have been helping.  According to Treasury statement, they’ve been helping to transfer funds and fighters to Syria for the al-Qaida elements.  Do you have anything on this this time?

MS. HARF:  I really just don’t have more on this than I think we’ve talked about.  I’d refer you to the Treasury Department and my colleagues there to speak to this.

QUESTION:  Actually, I talked to them.  They referred me to you to comment on this.

MS. HARF:  I love when that happens.  So I’ll refer you back, and I will talk with them and see if we can get you anything.  Again, it’s a Treasury designation --

QUESTION:  Yes.

MS. HARF:  -- so I think they’re probably most appropriate to speak to that issue.

QUESTION:  This is about how Iranian operatives are in Iran helping al-Qaida elements in Syria.  This kind of analysis or your take on this is the question to you.

MS. HARF:  Well, look, broadly speaking, we’ve made our concerns clear about some of Iran’s activities in Syria.  But beyond that, let me talk to my Treasury colleagues, but I’d recommend you give them another call and they can speak to their designation a little bit more.

QUESTION:  Thank you.

MS. HARF:  Thank you, Ilhan. 

Readout of President Obama’s Call with Prime Minister Erdogan

HE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 19, 2014

Readout of President Obama’s Call with Prime Minister Erdogan

President Obama spoke by phone today with Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey on a range of bilateral and regional issues.  The President affirmed the value he places on a strong, mutually respectful bilateral relationship with the Republic of Turkey and expressed his view that Turkey can demonstrate leadership in the world through positive engagement.  The President and Prime Minister agreed on the importance of close cooperation between our two countries to address the growing terrorist presence in Syria and on the shared interest in continuing efforts to advance a political solution to the Syria conflict.  The President and Prime Minister discussed the importance of encouraging Baghdad and Erbil to find common ground on energy issues and supporting the agreement they achieve.  The President thanked the Prime Minister for his constructive role in the effort on Cyprus to renew negotiations for a settlement.  The Prime Minister noted the launch ceremony for the Boeing 737 Peace Eagle on Friday. The President and Prime Minister spoke about the importance of quickly concluding the normalization agreement with Israel.  The leaders also discussed the need for strong, sustainable, and balanced growth in the global economy, and the President noted the importance of sound policies rooted in the rule of law to reassure the financial markets, nurture a predictable investment environment, strengthen bilateral ties, and benefit the future of Turkey.